EKSPLORASI PRAKTIK PEMBELAJARAN BERDIFERENSIASI DALAM MENGAKOMODASI KEBERAGAMAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN BAHASA INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55883/jipkis.v6i3.286Keywords:
differentiated learning; literacy abilities; Indonesian language instruction; student diversity; case study.Abstract
This study aims to explore differentiated learning practices in accommodating the diversity of students’ literacy abilities in Indonesian language instruction at SMA Islam Al Adib, Pandeglang Regency. This study employs a qualitative approach with a case study design. The research participants consist of Indonesian language teachers and students purposively selected to represent different levels of literacy ability. Data are collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documentation, and are analyzed through data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. Based on the data, students’ literacy abilities are classified into three categories: well-developed (25%), meeting expectations (45%), and requiring further support (30%). The study also indicates a change in the average literacy score from 54.6 to 75.8 following the implementation of differentiated learning. Differentiated learning practices are reflected in three main aspects: content differentiation, which involves providing reading materials with varying levels of complexity; process differentiation, which involves guidance and group discussions; and product differentiation, which provides students with alternative formats for completing literacy-related tasks. These findings suggest that differentiated learning has the potential to create learning experiences that are more responsive to students’ needs, readiness levels, and individual characteristics. Therefore, differentiated learning can serve as a pedagogical approach to supporting the development of students’ literacy abilities in a more inclusive learning environment.
Downloads
References
Azimah, I., & Sujannah, W. D. (2024). The effect of differentiated learning on EFL students’ reading skills. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(1), 937–946. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.473
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hasanah, E., Suyatno, S., Maryani, I., Al Badar, M. I., Fitria, Y., & Patmasari, L. (2022). Conceptual model of differentiated-instruction (DI) based on teachers’ experiences in Indonesia. Education Sciences, 12(10), 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100650
Hu, L. (2024). Utilization of differentiated instruction in K-12 classrooms: A systematic literature review (2000–2022). Asia Pacific Education Review, 25, 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09931-y
Juwita, R., Sukmawati, F., Santosa, E. B., Cahyono, B. T., Prihatin, R., Suparmi, Ridhani, J., & Trisnaningsih, S. (2025). How to differentiate instruction for deeper learning using cognitive task analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.24832/jpkp.v18i2.1312
Karst, K., Bonefeld, M., Dotzel, S., Fehringer, B. C. O. F., & Steinwascher, M. (2022). Data-based differentiated instruction: The impact of standardized assessment and aligned teaching material on students’ reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 79, Article 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101597
Labordo, D. C., Jr. (2024). Assessing the influence of differentiated instruction on enhancing reading comprehension skills among learners: A quasi-experimental study. The New English Teacher. https://assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/newEnglishTeacher/article/view/7951
Magableh, I. S. I., & Abdullah, A. (2021). The impact of differentiated instruction on students’ reading comprehension attainment in mixed-ability classrooms. Interchange, 52(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09427-3
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II): Country notes—Indonesia. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/indonesia_c2e1ae0e-en.html
Schlunegger, M. C., Zumstein-Shaha, M., & Palm, R. (2024). Methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies: A scoping review. Western Journal of Nursing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241263011
Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated instruction in secondary education: A systematic review of research evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366
Tundreng, S., Yawan, H., & Marhamah, M. (2025). Implementing differentiated instruction in Indonesian secondary schools: Opportunities and challenges from language teachers. English Review: Journal of English Education, 13(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v13i1.10741
UNESCO. (2017, September 8). Media and information literacy, a critical approach to literacy in the digital world. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/media-and-information-literacy-critical-approach-literacy-digital-world
Yustina, C., & Antonius, T. P. (2026). Diferensiasi instruksi dan asesmen inklusif dalam pendidikan: Sebuah tinjauan literatur tentang praktik, tantangan, dan strategi implementasi. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v10i1.2057
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nenden Suciyati Sartika H, enri Henriyan Alghadri, Purlilaiceu, Warno, Rohanah, Esti Suhesti, Safira

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






