Ketimpangan Dana BOS per Siswa antara Sekolah di Daerah 3T dan Non-3T: Analisis Satuan Biaya BOS Reguler 2025 di 514 Kabupaten/Kota

Authors

  • Supatmin Supatmin Universitas Pamulang
  • Akhmad Akbar Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55883/jipkis.v6i2.277

Keywords:

BOS grant; unit cost; 3T regions; disadvantaged districts; special areas; education finance inequality; Theil index

Abstract

Background: Since 2022 Indonesia’s School Operational Assistance (BOS) grant has used region-specific per-student unit costs, and in fiscal year 2025 schools in designated special areas receive a separate unit cost. The size of the per-student gap between disadvantaged, frontier, and outermost (3T) regions and other regions has not been openly measured. Objective: To measure the size and pattern of inequality in BOS per-student unit costs for primary (SD) and junior secondary (SMP) schools between 3T and non-3T areas. Methods: Descriptive-comparative analysis of Annex I of Ministerial Decree 8/P/2024 (2025 unit costs) for 514 districts. 3T was defined as (1) the 62 disadvantaged districts under Presidential Regulation 63/2020 and (2) the special-area unit cost applied to schools in designated villages. Differences were tested with Mann–Whitney tests and Cliff’s delta; inequality was measured with Gini and decomposed Theil indices. School-level allocations and enrolment were not available, so the analysis concerns per-student rates rather than funds received. Results: Regular SD unit costs ranged from IDR 900,000 to IDR 1.96 million (ratio 2.18). Disadvantaged districts averaged IDR 1.34 million, 37.9% above other districts (Cliff’s δ = 0.63; p < 0.001), with a similar gap for SMP (39.3%). The gap came almost entirely from Papua: outside Papua it was 7.5%, and disadvantaged districts in Nusa Tenggara and Sulawesi received lower average rates than their neighbours. Island region explained 71% of between-district inequality, disadvantaged status 40%. The special-area rate equals the regular rate times a fixed island-group factor, from 1.128 (Java) to 1.275 (Papua), adding IDR 120,000 to IDR 426,000 per SD student on average. Of the 55 disadvantaged districts with readable status, 54 had special-area rates. Conclusion: The 2025 formula gives 3T areas more per student, but the premium follows regional price indices rather than degree of disadvantage. Disadvantaged districts outside Papua gain little, and special-area schools in Java still receive less than the median disadvantaged district. Findings should be verified with school-level allocation and enrolment data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abao, A. S., & Gaffar, Z. H. (2022). The implementation of school operational assistance at the border. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 13(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.30997/jsh.v13i1.4251

Akita, T. (2003). Decomposing regional income inequality in China and Indonesia using two-stage nested Theil decomposition method. The Annals of Regional Science, 37(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001680200107

Akita, T., Riadi, A. A., & Rizal, A. (2021). Fiscal disparities in Indonesia in the decentralization era: Does general allocation fund equalize fiscal revenues? Regional Science Policy & Practice, 13(6), 1842–1866. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12326

Andrews, M., Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2002). Revisiting economies of size in American education: Are we any closer to a consensus? Economics of Education Review, 21(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00006-1

Bjork, C., & Susanti, D. (2023). Can community participation leverage changes in teacher behavior? Evidence from remote areas of Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 102, Article 102840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102840

Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2005). How much more does a disadvantaged student cost? Economics of Education Review, 24(5), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.015

Fazekas, M. (2012). School funding formulas: Review of main characteristics and impacts (OECD Education Working Papers No. 74). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k993xw27cd3-en

Glewwe, P., & Muralidharan, K. (2016). Improving education outcomes in developing countries. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 5, pp. 653–743). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63459-7.00010-5

Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The failure of input-based schooling policies. The Economic Journal, 113(485), F64–F98. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00099

Jackson, C. K., Johnson, R. C., & Persico, C. (2016). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv036

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 23 Tahun 2020 tentang Pedoman Penetapan Daerah Khusus dalam Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pendidikan Nasional. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/156511/Permendikbud%20Nomor%2023%20Tahun%202020.pdf

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2021). Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 160/P/2021 tentang Daerah Khusus Berdasarkan Kondisi Geografis. https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/Kepmendibudristek160-P-2021DaerahKhususGeografi.pdf

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022a). Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 27/P/2022 tentang Satuan Biaya Dana Bantuan Operasional Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Reguler, Bantuan Operasional Sekolah Reguler, dan Bantuan Operasional Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Kesetaraan Masing-Masing Daerah. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CRuYRIE-IGO43Xd7LwDs_evgptKZudv0/view

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 63 Tahun 2022 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Satuan Pendidikan. https://peraturan.go.id/files/bn1342-2022.pdf

Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2024). Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Nomor 8/P/2024 tentang Satuan Biaya, Penerima Dana, dan Besaran Alokasi Dana Bantuan Operasional Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Reguler, Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah Reguler, dan Dana Bantuan Operasional Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Kesetaraan Reguler Tahun Anggaran 2025. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aI-cRaPgUiOH6nReHbTeQB_jTBtJauts/view

Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2026). Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Nomor 61 Tahun 2026 tentang Penerima Dana dan Besaran Alokasi Dana Bantuan Operasional Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Afirmasi, Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah Afirmasi, dan Dana Bantuan Operasional Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Kesetaraan Afirmasi Tahun Anggaran 2026. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ueF4KPsOqREV4y16ayRscrafx-6yRNYp/view

Lafortune, J., Rothstein, J., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2018). School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20160567

Lewis, B. D. (2017). Local government spending and service delivery in Indonesia: The perverse effects of substantial fiscal resources. Regional Studies, 51(11), 1695–1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1216957

Matani, C. D., & Bleskadit, N. H. (2022). Mengenali isu akuntabilitas manajemen dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) di Provinsi Papua. KEUDA: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan Daerah, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.52062/keuda.v7i1.2135

OECD. (2017). The funding of school education: Connecting resources and learning. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264276147-en

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 63 Tahun 2020 tentang Penetapan Daerah Tertinggal Tahun 2020–2024. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/136563/perpres-no-63-tahun-2020

Pusat Analisis Anggaran dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara. (t.t.). Pendidikan dasar dan menengah di daerah 3T dan daerah marginal (Analisis Ringkas Cepat). Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI. https://berkas.dpr.go.id/pa3kn/analisis-ringkas-cepat/public-file/analisis-ringkas-cepat-public-78.pdf

Rosser, A., & Joshi, A. (2013). From user fees to fee free: The politics of realising universal free basic education in Indonesia. Journal of Development Studies, 49(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2012.671473

Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. (2021, September 8). Nadiem: Syarat minimal 60 siswa tidak berlaku untuk penyaluran BOS tahun 2022. https://setkab.go.id/nadiem-syarat-minimal-60-siswa-tidak-berlaku-untuk-penyaluran-bos-tahun-2022/

Shorrocks, A. F. (1980). The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica, 48(3), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913126

Sulistyaningrum, E. (2016). Impact evaluation of the School Operational Assistance Program (BOS) using the matching method. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.10319

Suryadarma, D., Suryahadi, A., Sumarto, S., & Rogers, F. H. (2006). Improving student performance in public primary schools in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Education Economics, 14(4), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290600854110

Wirandana, P. A., & Khoirunurrofik, K. (2024). Educational inequality in Indonesia: Are intergovernmental fiscal transfers effective in reducing the gap? Educational Studies, 50(6), 1424–1443. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2022.2103647

World Bank. (2014). Assessing the role of the School Operational Grant Program (BOS) in improving education outcomes in Indonesia (Report No. AUS4133). https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/779451468253241136/pdf/AUS4133-REVISED-WP-PUBLIC-Box391467B-BOS-Review-Main-Report-28May2015.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

Supatmin, S., & Akbar, A. . (2026). Ketimpangan Dana BOS per Siswa antara Sekolah di Daerah 3T dan Non-3T: Analisis Satuan Biaya BOS Reguler 2025 di 514 Kabupaten/Kota. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Keislaman, 6(2), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.55883/jipkis.v6i2.277