PENINGKATAN KINERJA GURU DALAM PENGEMBANGAN EVALUASI HASIL BELAJAR MELALUI SUPERVISI AKADEMIS KEPALA SEKOLAH DI UPT SDN GEMBOR 2

Authors

  • Yayat Dimyati SDN Gembor 2

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55883/jipkis.v2i2.25

Keywords:

Learning Outcome Evaluation Development, Teacher Performance, Supervisi Akademik Kepala Sekolah, Pengembangan Evaluasi Hasil Belajar, Kinerja Guru

Abstract

The feasibility of teaching is not enough to only be measured based on formal education but must also be measured based on the teacher's ability to teach and mastery of the material, master, choose and use methods, media and evaluation of learning. The ability of elementary school teachers in mastering learning materials is generally very worrying because of the sample of elementary school teachers who were asked to show their ability to master lesson materials, 70% did not master the subject matter, while only 30% mastered the subject matter. Such conditions are exacerbated by the less than optimal supervisory function of the Principal. If so far many opinions state that the professionalism of teachers in Indonesia is relatively low or inadequate, this is a result of the lack of supervision of the principal. The purpose of this school action research (PTS) is to find out the extent to which the principal's coaching through academic supervision is to improve teacher performance in the development of evaluation of learning outcomes. In this school action research (PTS) it was carried out in 3 cycles, from the results of the actions taken it was proven to be able to improve teacher performance by achieving ideal standards. From 60.45% in the first cycle, it can increase to 70.45% in the second cycle, and 77.27% in the third cycle. The results of this action research indicate that coaching through the academic supervision of the principal can improve teacher performance in the development of evaluation of learning outcomes with completeness reaching 100%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin, I. 2000. Profesionalisme Guru: Analisis Wacana Reformsi Pendidikan dam Era Globalisasi. Simposium Nasional Pendidikan di Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 25-26 Juli 2001.

Arikunto, Suharsini. 2004. Dasar – dasar Supervisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

________________.2007. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta : PT.Bumi Aksara.

Atmodiwiro, Soebagio dan Soenarto Tatosiswanto, 1991. Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Semarang: Adhi Waskitho.

Bafadal Ibrahim, 1979. Supervisi Pengajaran Teori dan Aplikasinya dalam Membina Profesional Guru, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Dedi Herawan, 2005. Pengembangan Model Supervisi Akademik Mata Pelajaran IPA-Biologi: Efektifitas Model Inovasi Supervisi Akademik Mata Pelajaran IPA Biologi dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru IPA Biologi di SMU. Tesis Tidak diterbitkan UPI Bandung.

Semiawan, Conny. 1985. Bagaimana Cara Membina Guru Secara Profesional. Jakarta: Journal Pendidikan.

Sergiovani, Cs. 1975. “Beyond Human Relations” Profesional Supervision for Profesional Teachers. Washington DC: Association for supervision and Curiculum Development. 1979. Supercision: Human Prepectives. New York: MeGraw-Hill Book Company.

Suyanto dan Djihad Hisya. 2000. Refleksi dan Reformasi Pendidikan Indoenesia Memasuki Millenium III. Adi Cita. Yogyakarta.

Tilaar, 1987. Futurisme dan Pengambilan Kebijakan pendidikan Menyongsong Abad-21. Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Tetap Perencanaan Pendidikan. IKIP Jakarta.

Yusuf A. Hasan. 2002. Pedoman Kepala Sekolahan Untuk Madrasah dan Sekolah Umum. Mekar Jaya. Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-30

How to Cite

Dimyati, Y. . (2022). PENINGKATAN KINERJA GURU DALAM PENGEMBANGAN EVALUASI HASIL BELAJAR MELALUI SUPERVISI AKADEMIS KEPALA SEKOLAH DI UPT SDN GEMBOR 2 . Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Keislaman, 2(2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.55883/jipkis.v2i2.25