PENGAJARAN BAHASA INGGRIS DALAM KURIKULUM 2013: SUATU TINJAUAN DAN PERSPEKTIF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55883/jipkis.v1i2.12Keywords:
Kurikulum 2013, pengajaran bahasa Inggris, perspektif guru , Curriculum 2013, ELT, teachers’ perspectivesAbstract
This study aimed at reviewing ELT and in use Curriculum 2013 and revealing teachers’ perspectives regarding its implementation. This was qualitative research using open-ended interview. Its participants were 5 teachers from 5 different schools, ranging from pilot to accompanying schools. The result shows that there are some differences between K-13 and KTSP in terms of curricular terminologies, the emphasis of students’ affective aspect, and learning approach; it is still difficult to create lesson plans of K-13 syllabi; overloaded aspects in students’ report cards to be assessed; confusing instructional models; lack of socialization and involvement of the teachers; K-13 uses a holistic approach; extra hours for character and religious education; autonomous learning; compact materials; reduction of English teaching hours; removal of English from elementary school; insufficient materials at primary levels; and so forth. Hence, this study concluded though Curriculum 2013 has already been well organized, yet it still needs more planning, socialization, involvement of many parties, and improvement of some factors should be more take into account by all elements of national education for the improvement of its implementation
Downloads
References
Bandi, & Wales. (2005). Curriculum development. Diakses dari http:// www.jsums.edu/fulbright/FLTA/curriculum_development.html
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Piblications, Inc.
Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun ,H. H.(2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Gagne, R. W. (1967). Curriculum research and the promotion of learning. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Schriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curricular evaluation. Chicago, Il: Rand McNally.
Hidayat, R., Siswanto, A., & Bangun, B. N. (Eds.). (2017). Dinamika perkembangan kurikulum di Indonesia: Rentjana Pembelajaran 1947 hingga Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Labsos UNJ.
Jayanti, F. G., & Norahmi, M. (2014). EFL: Revisiting ELT practices in Indonesia. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 4 (1), 5—14. doi: 10.23971/jefl.v4i1.70
Kasim, M. (2014). Konsep dan implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kemendikbud. (2012). Dokumen Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Kompetensi Dasar: Sekolah Dasar (SD)/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI). Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Kompetensi Dasar: Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA)/Madrasah Aliyah (MA). Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Kompetensi Dasar: Sekolah Menengan Pertama (SMP)/Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs). Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Pembelajaran berbasis kompetensi mata pelajaran bahasa Inggris melalui pendekatan saintifik. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
McKay, S. L. (2008). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Nuh, M. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Nur, M. R., & Madkur, A. (2014). Teachers’ voices on the 2013 Curriculum for English instructional activities. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 1 (2), 119—134. doi: 10.15408/ijee.v1i2.1340
Nuraini, D. (2019). Curriculum change: Implementing the 2013 English Curriculum in senior high schools in West Java province, Indonesia. (A doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter, 2019). Diakses dari https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/121330/NurainiD.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=2
Nurcahyoko, K. (20 Juli, 2013). Curriculum 2013: the next oasis or mirage? Diakses dari http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/07/20/curriculum-2013-the-next-oasis-or-mirage.html
Sakhiyya, Z. (23 Februari, 2013). National Curriculum 2013: should one-size-fits-all? Diakses dari http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/02/23/national-curriculum-2013-should-one-size-fits-all.html
Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st century learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 90 (9), 630—634. Diakses dari http://68.77.48.18/RandD/Phi%20Delta%20Kappan/Measuring%20Skills%20for%2021st%20Century%20-%20Silva.pdf
Panjaitan, M., Wachidah, S., Sumarni, S., Luciana, Sukhriani, Y., Sumaydia, & Gunawan, A. (2014). Pedoman guru mata pelajaran bahasa Inggris untuk
Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA)/Madrasah Aliyah (MA) dan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK)/Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan (MAK). Jakarta: Kemendikbud. Diakses dari https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/kurikulum/data/data/6%20Pedoman%20Kurikulum/Pedoman%20Guru/34-SMA_06%20Pedoman%20Bahasa%20Inggris.pdf
Yuridar, L. (2015). The implementation of Scientific Approach of the 2013 Curriculum in English teaching and learning. (An undergraduate’s thesis, Syekh Nurjati State Islamic Institute of Cirebon, 2015). Diakses dari http://repository.syekhnurjati.ac.id/2885/1/LECI%20YURIDAR%20PBAI%202015%20%28WM%20BLM%29.pdf
Zein, S., Sukyadi, D., Hamied, F. A., & Lengkanawati, N. S. (2020). English language education in Indonesia: A review of research (2011–2019). Language Teaching, 1—33. doi:10.1017/S0261444820000208
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 JIPKIS : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Keislaman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






